Waiting Lists in Canada: Reality or Hype? American Medical Student Association Prepared by Kao-Ping Chua, AMSA
نویسنده
چکیده
Introduction Waiting lists in Canada have been a highly symbolic issue to people on both sides of the U.S.-Canada border. For those who support privatization of the Canadian healthcare system, the waiting lists speak to a vast lack of healthcare delivery capacity in the public system. Such lists, they argue, would be minimized by moving towards a two-tiered system of care in which the public system existed alongside a parallel private system that would allow privately insured patients to "jump the queues" i.e. get faster access to care. On the other hand, for those who believe in the fundamental principles of equity that the Canadian system is built on, the waiting lists point not to a fundamental flaw in the structure of the Canadian healthcare system but rather to a gross underfunding of the system, which has been triggered largely by reductions in federal funding to provinces for healthcare. The answer, these advocates argue, is to increase funding levels for the current system without moving towards a two-tiered system.
منابع مشابه
The “PharmFree” Campaign: Educating Medical Students about Industry Influence
T he American Medical Student Association (AMSA), with more than a half-century history of medical student activism, is the oldest and largest independent association of physicians-in-training in the United States. As the voice for over 50,000 members, AMSA has prided itself on fostering ideals such as honesty and integrity, and on promoting the interests of patients and communities. In 2002, w...
متن کاملSetting priorities for waiting lists: defining our terms. Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project.
In order to develop standardized measures to assess patients' relative priority for services for which there are waiting lists, it is essential that key terms be clearly defined. We propose that severity be defined as the degree or extent of suffering, limits to activities or risk of death; that urgency be defined as severity combined with considerations of the expected benefit and the natural ...
متن کاملThe updated AMSA scorecard of conflict-of-interest policies: a survey of U.S. medical schools
BACKGROUND Best practices for conflict-of-interest (COI) policies in medical schools have evolved rapidly over the past decade, in part motivated by the American Medical Student Association (AMSA) scorecard that has publicly graded schools since 2007. This report describes the methodological update and impact of revisions to the scorecard in 2014. METHODS The original AMSA scorecard (used ann...
متن کاملChanges in health and medical spending among young adults under health reform.
Changes in Health andMedical Spending Among YoungAdults Under Health Reform BeginningSeptember23, 2010, theAffordableCareActallowed young adults to be covered under their parents’ plans until 26 years of age. This dependent coverage provision increased insurance coverage and access among young adults.1,2 However, the association between implementation of the provisionandmedical spending, health...
متن کاملAssociation of Medical Students' Reports of Interactions with the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industries and Medical School Policies and Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study
BACKGROUND Professional societies use metrics to evaluate medical schools' policies regarding interactions of students and faculty with the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. We compared these metrics and determined which US medical schools' industry interaction policies were associated with student behaviors. METHODS AND FINDINGS Using survey responses from a national sample of 1,...
متن کامل